Follow up

• +300

  by LuckyHyena
  on 2022-08-03 18:37

• +100

  by Bjuzz
  on 2022-08-03 17:57

• +300

  by Knuffel
  on 2022-08-03 07:55

• +100

  by A Filthy Devil
  on 2022-08-03 00:10

• +1

  by SebGreg732
  on 2022-08-02 23:57

• +300

  by CristalViper
  on 2022-08-02 13:13

• +300

  by Rowan Silveroak
  on 2022-08-02 11:54

• +300

  by DarkLordLK
  on 2022-08-01 17:45

• +1

  by JibstaMan
  on 2022-08-01 13:24

• +300

  by KhaledAliAsad
  on 2022-08-01 08:00

• +300

  by Beowulf68
  on 2022-07-31 21:54

• +300

  by Soulleesi
  on 2022-07-30 22:41

• +300

  by Izdog
  on 2022-07-30 15:12

• +300

  by lia_anna
  on 2022-07-30 02:10

• +1

  by AuraGuard
  on 2022-07-30 01:59

• +100

  by Kat9kelly
  on 2022-07-30 01:51

• +300

  by juslarke
  on 2022-07-29 21:04

• +300

  by Twighdark
  on 2022-07-29 10:22

• +300

  by Jhaelenn
  on 2022-07-28 17:43

• +100

  by Battlemaster101
  on 2022-07-27 21:27

• +100

  by cow2face
  on 2022-07-27 15:19

• +300

  by Logan Mountain
  on 2022-07-25 13:03

  there are comments for and against this and I think they all make good points ... creating just "monarchy" would fix the gender and label limitations of "kingdom" without getting TOO specific about the type of monarchy (which could be expanded upon within the article) ... I have a species that is a monarchy based loosely on insect hives, so it's entirely a hereditary "queen-dom" ... but most monarchy's historically were male led ... but what about an AI monarchy where they had no sex at all? ... anyway ... I think I'm beating a dead horse ... "monarchy" seems to balance everything out?

• +100

  by storyauthor
  on 2022-07-25 02:58

• +300

  by ShinigamiAleksi
  on 2022-07-24 18:09

• +300

  by Musicscout
  on 2022-07-24 14:02

• +300

  by mezzopatricia
  on 2022-07-24 06:24

• +300

  by A Enfeebled Bananafolk
  on 2022-07-23 16:52

• +300

  by A Rambunctious Devil
  on 2022-07-22 23:09

• -100

  by Hanhula
  on 2022-07-22 10:31

• +100

  by jwacalex
  on 2022-07-21 19:49

• +300

  by RibenLARP
  on 2022-07-21 13:35

• -100

  by Imp_King
  on 2022-07-20 18:18

• +300

  by braintird
  on 2022-07-20 18:08

• +300

  by A Wild Dimensional Horror
  on 2022-07-20 15:58

  PLEASE ADD THIS ASAP

• -300

  by Drakolisk Lord
  on 2022-07-20 04:46

  Two Words: Geopolitical, Kingdom

• -300

  by themrbeasley
  on 2022-07-20 00:13

• +300

  by kaibrightwing
  on 2022-07-19 20:04

• -300

  by LisaGrimm
  on 2022-07-19 10:05

• +300

  by Hilltoper19
  on 2022-07-18 21:59

• +100

  by Pete Nelson
  on 2022-07-18 17:45

• +1

  by Vibeca
  on 2022-07-18 09:01

• +300

  by DerekHeihachi
  on 2022-07-17 19:44

• +300

  by Delpheus
  on 2022-07-17 16:05

• -100

  by UnknownWriter88
  on 2022-07-17 15:35

• -300

  by A Thundering Bananafolk
  on 2022-07-17 09:43

• +100

  by A Adorable Devil
  on 2022-07-16 18:53

  I agree. Monarchs don't exist in a vaccuum. They get old, they die, they can be deposed. Kingdoms often have lengthy histories with other kingdoms and that history can be pretty important to plot, so having a system that better supports a hereditary system for royalty makes the most sense to me.

• +100

  by A Thundering Dryad
  on 2022-07-16 14:29

• +100

  by TexReb90
  on 2022-07-16 07:13

• +100

  by priestraven
  on 2022-07-15 17:07

• -1

  by Michael Chandra
  on 2022-07-15 14:20

  I mean, my country's monarchy is hereditary, but it's a constitutional monarchy.

• +100

  by Scalenex
  on 2022-07-14 15:58

• +100

  by A Cute Unicorn
  on 2022-07-14 15:51

• -100

  by P-47 Thunderbolt
  on 2022-07-14 15:49

  Hereditary doesn't actually say anything about the government system. A hereditary monarchy is a flavor of monarchy and could be absolute, constitutional, theocratic, etc. It's merely one way of choosing a leader, and that should be described within your article, just like any other method of choosing a leader.

• +100

  by ethawyn
  on 2022-07-14 14:46

• +300

  by Sach2000
  on 2022-07-14 12:25

• -300

  by A Thundering Goblin
  on 2022-07-14 11:35

  That already exists, and to quote  

  Absolute monarchy (or Absolutism as a doctrine) is a form of monarchy in which the monarch rules in their own right. In this kind of monarchy, the king or queen is by no means limited and has absolute power. These are often hereditary monarchies.

• +1

  by KitaKai
  on 2022-07-14 05:21

• +100

  by PhntmDrgn
  on 2022-07-14 03:51

• +300

  by MadKano
  on 2022-07-14 03:22

• +300

  by unoraptormon
  on 2022-07-14 03:21

• +100

  by ss2020
  on 2022-07-14 02:31

• +1

  by Ratha
  on 2022-07-14 01:36

• +100

  by A Fierce T-Rex
  on 2022-07-13 23:05

  To follow the existing structure, it would be best to be "Monarchy, Hereditary". I feel like some of the other monarchies listed could also be hereditary, but also see no problem with this being added if some people would find it useful.

• +1

  by Tijmuhn
  on 2022-07-13 21:23

• +300

  by wolven_blade
  on 2022-07-13 19:39